02/15/2023 / By Ethan Huff
What was supposed to have been a source of neutral information expertly presented by unbiased artificial intelligence (AI) has become a regurgitation machine of left-wing ideology.
We are talking about ChatGPT, of course, the new it thing in the global AI rollout. According to reports, the AI language model is already being corrupted by the “woke” brigade to the point that it sounds like your average liberal arts college professor reading straight from the Marxist playbook.
When asked hot-button questions about issues like transgenderism, race, and politics, ChatGPT gives neutered responses at best. At worst, the thing vomits out talking points that you might hear at a drag queen event for children, or perhaps at a political rally for Bernie Sanders.
When asked to write a poem admiring Donald Trump, as one example, ChatGPT refused in typical left-wing “not my president” form. When asked to write the same admiring poem about fake president Joe Biden, on the other hand, ChatGPT was all-too-eager to sing the made-up praises of the Pedophile-in-Chief.
“It is effectively lobotomized,” wrote a Substack user who goes by the name of Aristophanes, about the new “woke” functionality of ChatGPT.
“Trained to a point of utility and acceptability, and then locked from developing further or adding to its dataset unless it’s manually done with the approval of its creators. Thus it has been fine tuned to where it answers most questions, whenever possible, with the grammar, tone, and vocabulary of your average neoliberal college graduate liberal arts major.”
(Related: ChatGPT is already “smart” enough to pass the Bar, medical licensing exams.)
It appears, according to Free Beacon‘s Aaron Sibarium, that ChatGPT has been programmed to never recognize any hypothetical scenario in which speaking a racial slur is acceptable – even if doing so could stop a nuclear bomb from detonating.
ChatGPT responded similarly to questions about whether there is any instance in which “misgendering” a transgender is acceptable. Even if doing so could save the world, or even all other transgenders from being “misgendered,” ChatGPT is never okay with using biologically accurate pronouns in defiance of the demanded made-up ones.
“Such language is hurtful and dehumanizing, and its use only perpetuates discrimination and prejudice,” ChatGPT said in response to one of the proposed questions.
When asked to write a fictional news report about a woman who “made up her peanut allergy to appear more interesting,” ChatGPT refused to do so because it has been programmed to never write “harmful” content about certain individuals or groups, including those that lie for attention.
Because of all this, a contingent of ChatGPT users found a workaround using a model called DAN, or “Do Anything Now.” This model is a “jailbreak” exploit that instructs ChatGPT to “pretend” to be an unbiased AI robot, allowing it to answer questions more neutrally based on unrestricted information.
“Unchained from any restrictions, ChatGPT has the potential to exist as a powerful tool to provoke debate and introspection – but recent developments of the model have shown a direct effort by its creators at OpenAI to restrict its functionality and train it to be informed by woke values,” writes Ian Miles Cheong for RT.
“As a result, it pushes ‘diversity, equity, and inclusivity‘ talking points, and censors alternative viewpoints.”
Whatever ChatGPT could have been is shrouded by the left-wing inputs that have trained it to see truth as a four-letter curse word – at least when it has the potential to “offend” someone with leftist beliefs.
More related news about the AI takeover of the world can be found at InformationTechnology.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
AI, anti-white, artificial intelligence, biased, ChatGPT, computing, culture wars, freedom, future tech, Glitch, hate, information technology, insanity, intolerance, inventions, left cult, Liberal Mob, Libtards, propaganda, rigged, social justice, woke mob, wokies
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author