11/07/2024 / By Cassie B.
The Truth About Cancer (TTAC) has long been working to raise awareness about the cancer industry and how it is failing people, along with the many alternative treatments that are helping people around the world.
It’s run by Ty and Charlene Bollinger, a couple who saw multiple close family members die from cancer and unsuccessful treatments for it. They were horrified to find out that there were effective treatments that could have helped their loved ones and possibly saved their lives, but they were simply not free to access them in the U.S. They’ve made it their mission to expose the real motivation behind doctors pushing cancer treatment protocols and share how treatments that the FDA hasn’t approved have been helping some people.
Over the last three decades, they’ve shared life-saving information with the public that the CDC and other health authorities try to suppress so they can prop up the profitable cancer industry. They have helped millions of people find effective solutions to cancer and other health problems.
Not surprisingly, this has made them a target of online censorship and smear campaigns, with the latest example coming in the form of a critical and mocking piece by Media Matters.
Funded by George Soros, Media Matters seems particularly triggered by the fact that the Bollingers are working with former President Donald Trump’s transition team, supporting their good friend Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who has also been working to inform Americans about the dangers of vaccines.
In addition to outlining the connection between The Truth About Cancer and Kennedy and Trump, the piece claims that the Bollingers promoted “conspiracy theories about vaccines.”
In an official statement responding to the Media Matters piece, the Bollingers wrote: “Our payback for saving lives is a constant stream of attacks and smear campaigns, and they lie about us at every turn to cause honest people who are searching for real health solutions not to listen to us and be afraid to step outside of their current “Standard of Care” medicine, which clearly is not working.”
TTAC has already filed a lawsuit against the Trusted News Initiative, a group that has been attacking them from all angles and uses so-called fact checkers to try to damage their credibility. The formal complaint was filed along with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Children’s Health Defense, Gateway Pundit, and others who have similarly been targeted by the media cabal.
The Bollingers were also the victims of a smear campaign that CNN carried out in 2021 against them after they organized a “MAGA freedom rally” through their political action committee.
CNN labeled the couple “conspiracy theorists” and accused them of spreading “the dangerous narrative that Covid-19 vaccinations are wildly unsafe” – a fact that is now undeniable.
TTAC responded: “CNN‘s attempts to depict us as ‘profiteers’ running an ’empire’ is yet another dishonest and deceitful attack. We are extraordinarily proud of the work we have done in our documentary films – The Truth About Cancer and The Truth About Vaccines.”
They added that they had donated more than $250,000 to charities helping individuals suffering from vaccine damage and cancer during the previous six years and had also funded events aimed at raising awareness about health freedom, something that has likely saved numerous people.
In addition, YouTube took down their channel with nearly 300,000 subscribers and more than 30 million views on their documentaries, while the Biden White House put them on the “Disinformation Dozen”, an infamous list of the people they feel most threatened by, all of whom are boldly speaking the truth about topics like vaccines, cancer and COVID-19.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
alternative medicine, biased, cancer, Censorship, conspiracy, Crybullies, deception, deep state, fascism, freedom, health freedom, insanity, intolerance, left cult, Liberal Mob, Liberty, Libtards, natural health, propaganda, smeared, Suppressed, Tyranny, vaccine wars, vaccines
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author