60 Minutes faces backlash over fake news scandal promoting left-wing victims narratives

In a stunning blow to journalistic integrity, CBS’s 60 Minutes is under fire for airing a blatantly misleading segment that critics are calling government-funded propaganda. The segment, which aired recently, attempted to portray a former USAID employee as a struggling American worker caught in the crosshairs of President Trump and Elon Musk’s efforts to dismantle wasteful government spending. However, the truth reveals a far different story—one that has sparked outrage and calls for the show’s license to be revoked.

The controversy centers on 60 Minutes’ portrayal of a woman presented as an average civil servant who lost her job due to budget cuts. In reality, she was a former speechwriter for Samantha Power, a key figure in the Obama administration, and a participant in USAID’s propaganda efforts. This revelation, brought to light by Kari Lake’s viral social media post, has exposed the segment as a calculated attempt to manipulate public opinion and shield government corruption.

The fallout from this scandal raises serious questions about the role of legacy media in perpetuating state-sponsored narratives and the erosion of trust in once-revered institutions like 60 Minutes.

The anatomy of a fake news scandal

The 60 Minutes segment in question focused on the alleged hardships faced by federal employees affected by budget cuts under President Trump’s administration. The woman featured in the story was portrayed as a sympathetic figure—a single mother struggling to make ends meet after losing her job. However, investigative reporting and social media sleuths quickly uncovered that she was far from an ordinary worker.

• She was a former speechwriter for Samantha Power, a prominent figure in the Obama administration and a key player in USAID’s operations.

• She had only been employed at USAID for just over two years, contradicting the narrative of a long-serving civil servant.

• Her role was tied to USAID’s propaganda efforts, which have been criticized for using taxpayer dollars to fund misleading narratives.

Kari Lake, a prominent conservative voice, called out the segment in a viral post, stating, “She/Her was a speechwriter—and she had only been at USAID for just over two years.” The woman has since deleted her social media account, further fueling suspicions about the legitimacy of her portrayal.

USAID and government-funded propaganda

This scandal is not an isolated incident but part of a larger pattern of government-funded media manipulation. USAID, an agency tasked with providing foreign aid, has been accused of funneling taxpayer dollars into propaganda campaigns both domestically and abroad. The USAID’s efforts are designed to shape public opinion and protect the interests of the political elite, controlling news media that can’t even stand on its own merit or do original reporting.

The 60 Minutes segment appears to be a continuation of this trend, using emotional storytelling to deflect attention from the real issues at hand. As one social media user noted, “Samantha Power’s speechwriter being passed off as a common civil servant is a joke. USAID corruption runs deep, and it’s no surprise 60 Minutes tried to spin this.”

The backlash against 60 Minutes has been swift and severe. Social media platforms are flooded with calls for the show to be held accountable, with many demanding that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) revoke CBS’s broadcasting license.

• “60 Minutes is trash propaganda,” one user wrote.

• “This is deep state-run media and should be yanked off the air,” another commented.

• “If the FCC won’t take them down, we will. Stop watching this trash,” a third added.

Even political figures have weighed in. Senator Ted Cruz responded to the segment with a sharp rebuke, highlighting the disconnect between the media’s narrative and the reality of government waste. “Even though President Trump and DOGE are fighting for the American taxpayer and working to lower the deficit, the left and their media parrots are working overtime to smear DOGE and spin these taxpayer-funded piggy banks into beloved ‘Constitutional’ institutions,” Cruz said.

The decline of a once-respected institution

For decades, 60 Minutes was a bastion of investigative journalism, known for holding the powerful accountable and uncovering truths that others ignored. However, in recent years, the show has devolved into a platform for partisan narratives and government propaganda.

The erosion of trust in 60 Minutes mirrors the broader decline of legacy media, which has increasingly been accused of prioritizing ideology over truth. The 60 Minutes scandal is more than just a case of fake news—it’s a symptom of a broken system. When once-respected institutions abandon their commitment to truth in favor of partisan agendas, the public loses faith in the very foundations of democracy.

As the outcry against 60 Minutes demonstrates, Americans are no longer willing to tolerate state-sponsored propaganda masquerading as journalism. The show’s fall from grace serves as a cautionary tale for other media outlets: the truth will always come to light, and those who betray the public’s trust will pay the price.

Sources include:

Revolver.news

X.com

X.com